..

RQ:

Much of the destructive leadership literature has examined the effects of destructive leader behaviors on employees’ productivity, mental health, or turnover intent, but the focus is often on overtly abusive forms and neglects to examine the long-term effects on employees' sense of self. More subtle forms (such as gaslighting, undermining, destructive yes-saying) are often ignored or not included due to their covert nature. However, they're psychological effects on employees may be more impactful than the overt, flagrant abuse, due to their overlooked subtleties. I seek to answer the question: What is the difference between the effect of overt and covert destructive leadership on employees’ professional identity formation?

Boolean string: ("destructive leadership" OR "abusive leadership" OR "social undermining" OR "harassment" OR "petty tyranny" OR "coercive control" OR "abusive supervisory behavior*" OR "unsupportive managerial behavior*" OR "aversive leadership" OR "tyrannical leadership" OR "despotic leadership" OR "toxic leadership" OR "passive leadership" OR "exploitative leadership" OR "gaslighting" OR "bullying" OR "narcissistic leadership" OR "psychological aggression" OR "undermining leadership" OR "incivility" OR "supervisor mistreatment") AND ("employee identity" OR "professional identity" OR "work identity" OR "occupational identity" OR "role identity" OR "organizational identification" OR "self-concept" OR "identity threat" OR "identity work" OR "self-verification" OR "identity disruption" OR "authenticity at work" OR "sense of self")

Wow, what a fascinating topic. I look forward to learning more about your findings! 

Because my RQ is “How does male allyship shape perceptions of support for female leaders by male and female observers?”, I would try a variation of the following terms:

Boolean strings

Example: “male allyship” OR “male support” OR “men as allies” AND “female leaders” OR “women in leadership” AND “perceptions” OR “views” OR “observer perceptions”.

RQ: What theoretical mechanisms explain applicant reactions to DEI signals in job advertisements and do reactions differ by signal type?

Boolean search terms: (diversity OR signal OR DEI OR race OR gender OR identity-safety OR identity-threat OR multicultural OR colorblind OR affirmative action OR identity OR meritocracy OR justice OR inclusion OR exclusion OR intergroup ideology OR fairness OR equal opportunity OR corporate social responsibility) AND (personnel selection OR recruitment OR job applicant OR job recruit OR employee OR job advertisement OR applicant attraction OR applicant attitude OR applicant reaction OR job choice OR job acceptance OR organizational attraction)

(mental* OR "mental health" OR "mental wellbeing" OR "mental wellness" OR "mental health wellness" OR "mental well-being") AND (AI* OR robot* OR "artificial intelligence") AND ("service industry" OR "service sector" OR "customer service" OR hospitality OR retail OR tourism)

Hi Julia! For allyship, there are many terms that are similar but different you may want to consider including: allyhood, ally work, allied behavior, allied labor, champion, solidarity, solidarity-based collective action, collective action (this gives you more than allyship but is often used with allyship), sponsorship, co-conspiratorship 

RQ: How do student-teacher relationships impact male identifying individuals understanding of themselves?

“student-teacher relationship OR relational learning OR developmental relationship” AND “male-identifying OR boy” AND “identity development OR self-concept OR understanding of selves” AND “impact OR affect OR role”

I'm looking at selection measures in disabled versus nondisabled samples, I have a relatively long list of search terms for selection measures. 

"Employment interviews" OR "job interviews" OR "hiring interviews" OR "general mental ability" OR "general mental ability test" OR "general mental ability tests" OR "general mental ability exam" OR "general mental ability exams" OR "general cognitive ability" OR "general cognitive ability test" OR "general cognitive ability tests" OR "general cognitive ability exam" OR "general cognitive ability exams"OR "situational judgment test" OR "situational judgment tests" OR "sjt" OR "hiring process" OR "hiring practice" OR "employee selection" OR "personnel selection" OR "resume" OR "personality assessment" OR "personality test" OR "personality tests" OR "personality exam" OR "personality exams" OR "employment assessment" OR "employment test" OR "employment tests" OR "employment exam" OR "employment exams" OR "assessment center" OR "personnel selection" OR "employee selection" OR "performance evaluation" OR "performance appraisal" OR "performance assessment" OR "performance expectation" OR "decision to hire" OR "adverse impact" OR "employment discrimination" OR "workplace discrimination" OR "temperament test" OR "temperament tests" OR "temperament exam" OR "temperament exams" OR "job knowledge" OR "job knowledge test" OR "job knowledge tests" OR "job knowledge exam" OR "job knowledge exams" OR "physical ability" OR "physical ability test" OR "physical ability tests" OR "physical ability exam" OR "physical ability exams" OR "spatial ability" OR "spatial ability test" OR "spatial ability tests" OR "spatial ability exam" OR "spatial ability exams" OR "psychomotor ability" OR "psychomotor ability test" OR "psychomotor ability tests" OR "psychomotor ability exam" OR "psychomotor ability exams" OR "biodata" OR "accomplishment record" OR "work sample"
AND
”disability" OR "disabled" or "disabilities" OR "disorder" OR "disease" OR "health condition" OR "neurodiversity" OR "neurodiverse" OR "neurodivergent" OR "neurodivergence" OR "physically impaired" OR "physical impairment"

Search Term Tracker: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XmEOLIgjTxanWew9_k1LSg_i9bfOUvHoCSeGWpx4KDE/edit?usp=sharing

Boolean Strings examples:

• ("inclusive leadership") AND (burnout OR "emotional exhaustion")
• ("inclusive leadership") AND ("cynicism" OR "depersonalization")
• ("inclusive leadership") AND ("occupational stress" OR "job stress")

Hi Valeriya!

For your search, I'd suggest adding the terms "AI" and "well-being" to account for any deviations in how people spell well being or in case some articles only use the acronym in the title or abstract (not sure if you want to filter further or look at all results). 

Research Question: Based on experimental and quasi-experimental evidence, what is the causal effect of leadership interventions (e.g., styles, behaviors, or training programs) on individual, team, and organizational outcomes?

Search:

(leader* OR manager* OR supervisor* OR executive* OR "leadership style*" OR "leadership behavior*" OR "transformational leader*" OR "transactional leader*" OR "servant leader*" OR "leader* training” OR "leader* development" OR "leader* effectiveness")

AND

("experiment*" OR "randomized controlled trial" OR "RCT" OR "field experiment" OR "lab experiment” OR "quasi-experiment*" OR "natural experiment*" OR "controlled trial" OR "intervention*")

Jas, I think you can search for all these outcomes in one search using the operator OR

Your search terms tend to focus on the term "male"; what about "men" or "masculine" or "gender" (i.e., other terms that pull literature related to your topic that might not use the term "male")?